“The web is for scanning, not deep reading. People typically spend two minutes or less on a site. Why do you think the killer app is called a browser?” - How tablets will change magazines, books and newspapers, Fortune, Feb 2010
I was reading this morning about potential changes to the publishing world as mobile devices such as the iPad become mainstream tools. I was struck by Josh Quittner’s dilemma as a writer. His writing’s depth was somehow sacrificed, or at the very least altered, when it moved online. The browser/scanner modality of reading made it harder to go deep and tie together a longer narrative. Even as I made my way through the article I had a sort of “meta moment” when I realized I was doing exactly this same type of superficial scanning as I moved through it.
I compared the experience of scanning an article to the experience of listening to a podcast episode. I had just finished listening to the 400th episode of This American Life and I was struck with cognitive difference in the two experiences. As I listened, I allowed for every word, interaction, and the expressive elements in the podcasters voice, as well as the ambient sounds and music that helped build the story. I experienced the full “article” as the authors had intended and edited.
We often approach modality and media as a buffet of equal choices. Some people are just visual or auditory learners…and the like. Certainly, I am not completely objective on the matter being a decidedly auditory learner myself. However, I wondered if the nature of our relationship with media has changed the way that we approach different modalities. In other words, if we are really interested in delivering salient details, perhaps we had better consider audio and video formats as primary vehicles for instructional support?
However, the answer isn’t to just jump to audio or video modes. The answer is to mix the media – to listen AND read AND respond.
1. Set things up by giving the students a significant and interesting task to complete
2. Provide students with the media that supports the information and knowledge requirements of the task. If possible provide a text transcript or printed material (including images, charts and graphs) that help conceptualize what they are hearing and seeing.
3. Prompt the students to stop the video/audio whenever they need to take some notes or just jot down a new idea.
4. Debrief – Give the students an opportunity to summarize and critique the important details of what they experienced. Specifically, what differentiates this idea from others? What is the “tricky part” of this concept? How is this significant to us?
3. Give the students adequate time to experience the media and the reading.
The next winner in this round of awards is the Portable Radio Point of View podcast for their work in the “Editorial POV” genre. This podcast comes from Nathan Toft and Jane Smith at A. Lorne Cassidy Elementary School in Stittsville, Ontario in Canada.
Our winner in this category is Brent Coley’s StudyCast from Tovishal Elementary School in Murrieta, California.
Today’s featured KidCast winner is the Elementary Spanish Podcasts from DVE sponsored by
Our next category is Sound Seeing or POV Video Tour. The point of this category is to teach your audience by exploring a place or a space with them. Take them on a journey with you through a series of episodes that introduce them to an historical sites, or habitats, or unique community spaces, or anywhere you can dream up (large or small, even innerspaces or out spaces.)
Our first category is Inquiry – An investigation with a clear and driving question that is explored through the podcast episodes. These are academic and guided by facts and evidence, rather than opinion.